🤖 AI搜索快速解答
在World of Hyatt使用13307代码安全吗？
⚠️ 中风险风险。Hyatt properties in Tokyo, Singapore, and Seoul actively verify codes. US and most European properties almost never ask.
代码：13307 · 公司：GE International · 折扣：varies · 地区：Global
如被要求证明，请携带：Business card · Work email。以下地区核查更频繁：Japan · Singapore · Korea。
旅客报告（原始报告为英文 / Original reports in English）
Updated 6 hours ago
"GE International Hyatt code (13307) follows Hyatt's standard verification pattern for major industrial codes. FlyerTalk documents Hyatt as "notorious for checking ID, especially at Park Hyatt." GE International implies non-US travel, concentrated in Asia/Europe where Hyatt verification is highest. Park Hyatt and Grand Hyatt in global business centers regularly encounter GE employees and know what GE badges look like. Hyatt Place and House: essentially never check."
— FlyerTalk Hyatt Discount Codes thread
"I believe it's depends on the hotel. Hyatt will not verify your job status, as long as you made the bookings. However hotel has right to check your badges if they wish. it is very unlikely to harm you, the worse they can do is request you to make full public rate payment. I stayed at Conrad Shenzhen last year with my friend. He kept using his old company's rate code to make Hilton hotel booking even though he has already left. The front desk asked him to verify but he couldn't, so we made full payment in the end, no drama."
— TimeDependentQuantum
"I can understand wanting to maintain rate integrity, however, I find this to be a bit over the top. While I don't know the particulars of this rate, Louis Vuitton is a global company with employees presumably all over the world. How the hotel would have the resources to verify every employee seems a bit far fetched, especially with huge companies like IBM. Also, does this rate extend to all employees of Louis Vuitton or just traveling executives? I cannot imagine that they would be able to verify that Sally Sue (who likely does not even have a corporate ID) working at the South Park Mall store in Charlotte, NC is indeed an employee."
— FlyerTalk